COLUMN: "I Had A Dream"

Jul 26, 2009 No Comments by

Isn’t it interesting that, despite the countless ways the White House has interject to interject itself into our lives, President Obama still has time to stoke the fires of racial discrimination. Upon being questioned by reporters about the arrest of Henry Louis Gates Jr. (who has been a long-time friend of the President), Obama commented that James Crowley, the arresting Cambridge, Mass., police sergeant, had “acted stupidly.” He further explained the situation by stating that “there’s a long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately.” Isn’t it interesting how a president who claims to have broken the racial barriers of our nation is still emphasizing the use of racist practices such as profiling?

Since last November, we’ve been hearing about how the president has fulfilled Dr. King’s dream of having an African-American in the White House. Racial intolerance, especially against African-Americans, is all but history. There are occasional mishaps that occur that require local authorities to intervene and make corrections, but there should never be a word spoken by the president emphasizing the “long history” of racial profiling that officers have worked so hard to eliminate.

I know that Gates perhaps wasn’t the most harmful-looking of characters. I mean, how dangerous can a middle-aged man that uses a cane be, right? After all, he is a Harvard professor and he was in his own house. Yet there was no room for him to belligerently accuse Crowley, who has been deemed a stellar officer with an impeccable history of service along with a career of teaching classes against “racial profiling.” Crowley, summoned to Gates’ residence by a concerned neighbor, asked Mr. Gates to step onto the porch to speak with him. Gates refused and asked if it was because he was “a black man in America.” Gates proceeded to slander Crowley, calling him a racist and saying, “I’ll speak with your mama outside,” a sentiment hardly becoming of a Harvard professor.  Gates was arrested for disorderly conduct and hauled off to jail.

If you ask me, Gates deserved his treatment. If he’s going to try and reignite the “glory days” of racial protests by yelling at a police officer, he deserves to cool his jets of in the county clink for a day or two. The officer was summoned by the neighbor under the pretense that two black men were allegedly forcing their way into Gates’ house. Crowley, whose record has already been established, was clearly not there to intimidate nor threaten Professor Gates. Gates clearly needed to take a chill pill in this scenario and perhaps the county lock-up was just the place for him.

I don’t really care if your white, black, blue, yellow, green or purple: if you mouth off to a cop, you’d better be prepared to either back yourself up with some great evidence or be ready to spend some time in a jail cell. That sort of behavior shouldn’t be tolerated, especially coming from a person trying to use race as their get-out-of-jail-free card. To ignore that would only promote the continued use of the Race Card as a legitimate means of acquittal.

What has been even more controversial is that President Obama has stepped into the picture. His involvement has rekindled the flames of the race debate that has long existed in the liberal powder keg of Massachusetts. It is not his place to take sides on an issue like this. It’s micro-managing in the worst form. So now, instead of facing opposition from city or state authorities, the Cambridge police department is facing pressure from the White House of all places.

In my opinion, the comment made by Obama that Cambridge Police “acted stupidly” was, in fact, just as stupid. It was an ill-conceived attempt to garnish the support of minorities to rally behind his resolve to face the “evils” of society. He had stated that he was unaware of all the facts regarding the arrest, but the fact that he criticized Cambridge P.D. so harshly and so publicly has left him wide open for criticism from many different sources. If you ask me, he deserves the heat. When we’re faced with national issues of rising health care costs and economic depression, how can he possibly think to stoop down and pass judgment on one local issue, despite his personal ignorance to all the facts? Do we really need to fall back into the hole of racial discrimination to bolster up the declining approval ratings for the greenhorn president? If so, talk about digging through America’s couch cushions to find a few loose coins of controversy to fund his presidency.

When asked about his comments in the following days, Obama was surprised about the amount of controversy that his comments have sparked. Asked if he stood by his comments that the Cambridge police had acted stupidly, he did not give a clear cut answer but alluded to other issues facing the nation (deservedly so since he’s been eaten up by his last “stupid” statement).

It really isn’t the time for our Commander-in-Chief to be making little pit stops in the local affairs of our cities to pass his own judgment on affairs that involve personal friends. Most recently, after taking several days of intense criticism for his statements, the President phoned Crowley and went back on his original criticisms of the officer and expressed an interest in having both Gates and Crowley to the White House to share a beer over the subject. Now that’s diplomacy! Settling things over a pint (funny how it all returns to alcohol). It’s almost laughable how the President has retreated the moment people disapproved of his statements, even though he didn’t expressly apologize for his words about the Cambridge police department.

Some may deem this article as overly critical and opinionated, but since it is an “opinion” column, I’ll deal with the accusation of being overly critical. Underneath this whole mess lies an underlying problem: Our president, despite his claims of being fair and equal, still seems to be stoking the flames of racism by emphasizing his own ethnicity and commenting on misunderstandings such as the Gates/Crowley incident. If only Dr. King could see us now.

Jess Jones is a conservative political columnist for Rhombus.

Politics

About the author

The author didnt add any Information to his profile yet
  • Steve Pierce

    Jess, a few things:

    A) You say that Gates shouldn’t be allowed to use his race as a get-out-of-jail-free card. You’re right, but he wasn’t trying to, because there wasn’t anything to get out of jail for. He hadn’t committed a crime.

    B) Furthermore, you say that individuals who criticize police officers should “cool off” in jail. However, it is not a crime to criticize a police office, no matter how belligerently. In making this statement, are you suggesting that we give police unlimited power to arrest anyone they dislike, the law be damned? As you are an aspiring constitutional lawyer, I would hope you are not.

    C) While I will agree that it was politically stupid for the president to weigh in as strongly as he did, it’s important to remember that the question was asked of him. He didn’t go picking this fight. Sure, he reacted too strongly, but to say that he was using the situation to manipulate minority support is shameful. He was asked a question about a friend in a news conference and reacted in an understandably personal manner. That doesn’t mean he was wrong (it will always be stupid to arrest an obviously innocent man and then drop the charges four hours later), but he did overstate it. His political team probably wishes he had deferred on that question, but he didn’t and he gave his personal feelings on a matter that involved a friend. This isn’t political calculation or theater, just a human being speaking his mind and making an overly bold statement – something we all do regularly. So it’s a little unfair to be so harsh on him.

  • Juan

    also, if I remember correctly, he was asked his opinion several times before he finally answered. And when he revisited the subject after the uproar, his words about race were very appropriate. Unfortunately, the press usually reduces it to a sound bite, or simply unfairly characterizes the comments (see above). Here’s the good stuff:

    “My sense is you’ve got two good people in a circumstance in which neither of them were able to resolve the incident in the way that it should have been resolved, and the way they would have liked it to be resolved,” Obama said. “The fact that it has garnered so much attention, I think, is a testimony to the fact that these are issues that are still very sensitive here in America, and — you know, so to the extent that my choice of words didn’t illuminate but rather contributed to more media frenzy, I think that was unfortunate. What I would like to do, then, is to make sure that everybody steps back for a moment, recognizes that these are two decent people.

    “[B]ecause of our history, because of the difficulties of the past, you know, African-Americans are sensitive to these issues,” Obama said. “And even when you’ve got a police officer who has a fine track record on racial sensitivity, interactions between police officers and the African-American community can sometimes be fraught with misunderstanding. My hope is that as a consequence of this event, this ends up being what’s called a teachable moment where all of us, instead of pumping up the volume, spend a little more time listening to each other and try to focus on how we can generally improve relations between police officers and minority communities, and that instead of flinging accusations, we can all be a little more reflective in terms of what we can do to contribute to more unity.”

    Indeed.

  • Juan

    In the end, Obama nailed it right on the head the second time around. I disagree with him on most issues, but he’s intelligent and usually acts with reason. While it is stupid to arrest someone then drop the charges, his first response was unwarranted, especially in light of the fact that the two stories are drastically different. But Jess, aren’t you committing the same crime you accuse Obama of? You take the police officer at his word because “[his] record has already been established”, automatically discard Gates’ side of the story, and accuse others of a form a racism? In the name of political points?

    For all we know, Crawford would have acted differently if Gates was white. For all we know, Gates really lost total control and warranted incarceration (though I hope that would be more than “mouthing off”). More likely, though, was a little bit of both, and a lotta bit of pride, with Gates’ making a serious accusation of racism and Crawford taking offense, and arresting him to teach a lesson, thus abusing his police power. But your article really doesn’t help anything and is the kind of cheap political shop that you decry.

  • Jess

    Thank you for your opinions. It’s fun to hear what other people have to say. sadly very little was relevant if at all valid. Obama seems to have made a knee jerk reaction in his first statements and they were biased, uniformed, and very heated. Secondly, Gates was guilty of disorderly conduct. If it were me I would have had him arrested also for disturbing the peace and obstruction of justice (since the policemen were obviously tied up dealing with him).

    I’d agree with you juan except the fact that everything you quoted was a revisited argument and obviously came with a little bit of advisement from Obama’s staff. He’s definitely not speaking his mind on the issue anymore because he did a total 180 on his opinions from his first encounter with the issue. OF COURSE YOU CAN NAIL IT ON THE HEAD when you have a dozen advisers telling you what to say.

    Naturally he needs to recognize that he has the uncommon burden of having EVERYTHING he says mean something. He can’t even swat a fly without being attacked by some activist group. the leader of one of the most influential nations in the world ought to know to take a little more candor in commenting about things that pertain to such a heated topic like racism.

    If this columns seems displeasing to you, I hope that you would be in contact with the editor to publish something that is more to your liking. Thanks again.

  • Juan

    Jess, I agree that Obama should have used more deference with his comments, but apparently so does he. Even so, he never accused the officer of racism. He said it was stupid to arrest someone after they gave proof they were in their own home. Then he said that racial profiling is an issue “separate and apart from this incident”. All true. Racial profiling is a problem, and pretending it’s not allows it to persist. His error was weighing in on the issue in the context of this particular case, given the indeterminacy of the facts, which he acknowledged. All in all, when you read what Obama actually said, both the first and second times, it doesn’t seem as egregious as the right wing media wanted it to be.

    And that’s the big issue, how the Republican Party, whose platform is good enough to stand on its own merits, resorts to distorting facts, making assumptions, creating straw man arguments left and right, and declaring guilt with only a cursory knowledge of the facts (like you have done in your comment above). I don’t mind people being critical of Obama–like I said, I’ve got some issues with him myself–but it only hurts the conservative cause to throw out careless accusations and not give credit where credit is due. For some reason the party feels it has to take an passionate, absolutist stance in order to garner support. It doesn’t. I hope in the future your writings reflect a broader, more reasoned understanding of the issues and the ability to see past media fanaticism rather than being part of the echo chamber. It’s a change the party desperately needs.

    Where have all the William F. Buckley’s gone?