<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SONG OF THE DAY: August 31st</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rhombusmag.com/music/song-of-the-day-august-31st/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rhombusmag.com/music/song-of-the-day-august-31st/</link>
	<description>The source for local news and events in Utah</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:22:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	

<!-- Debugging help, do not remove -->
<meta name="Framework" content="Kpress" />
<meta name="Theme Version" content="1.0" />
<meta name="Framework Version" content="1.3.2" />
<meta name="CMS Version" content="2.9.2" />


	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Pierce</title>
		<link>http://www.rhombusmag.com/music/song-of-the-day-august-31st/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhombusmag.com/?p=1182#comment-406</guid>
		<description>Spike, you are certainly correct on all accounts. Yet I don&#039;t believe I attributed the songwriting to Rufus (if I did, I erred), but I should have made it more clear that Loudon wrote the song. Also, as you said, the song is not about homosexuality; however, it is very possible for it to be taken that way, especially by the less informed. So much of music depends on the interpretation of the listener and him/her imbuing those words with their own personal meaning. I think it&#039;s probably fair to say that many listener&#039;s would probably make a similar observation about the song from a cursory first glance, especially considering Rufus&#039; sexuality. However, you are correct in all the thing you stated. Sorry for the lack of clarity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spike, you are certainly correct on all accounts. Yet I don&#8217;t believe I attributed the songwriting to Rufus (if I did, I erred), but I should have made it more clear that Loudon wrote the song. Also, as you said, the song is not about homosexuality; however, it is very possible for it to be taken that way, especially by the less informed. So much of music depends on the interpretation of the listener and him/her imbuing those words with their own personal meaning. I think it&#8217;s probably fair to say that many listener&#8217;s would probably make a similar observation about the song from a cursory first glance, especially considering Rufus&#8217; sexuality. However, you are correct in all the thing you stated. Sorry for the lack of clarity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spike</title>
		<link>http://www.rhombusmag.com/music/song-of-the-day-august-31st/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>spike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhombusmag.com/?p=1182#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Not to be that guy, but:

a) Rufus didn&#039;t write this song
b) his dad, Loudon Wainwright III, did
c) it&#039;s not about being gay; i&#039;m pretty sure it&#039;s about being self-centered</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to be that guy, but:</p>
<p>a) Rufus didn&#8217;t write this song<br />
b) his dad, Loudon Wainwright III, did<br />
c) it&#8217;s not about being gay; i&#8217;m pretty sure it&#8217;s about being self-centered</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
